ZenGRC Is The LogicGate Alternative That’s Already Built

LogicGate’s Risk Cloud is a no-code graph database. You have to design the data model, build out Applications for each part of your program, and configure how controls, risks, and evidence connect to each other. But ZenGRC ships with the program already built.

ZenGRC is a modern GRC with controls, frameworks, evidence, audits, and vendors are connected out of the box, while one flat rate covers unlimited users, frameworks, and vendors. Most teams are live in weeks, with our people running the setup alongside yours.

Book a demo

★ ★ ★ ★ ☆

4.4 / 5 from reviews on

Top Companies
Choose ZenGRC

ZenGRC vs LogicGate at a glance

#	Feature	ZenGRC	LogicGate
1	What you buy	One platform with compliance, audit, risk, policy, and vendor management included	Individual Applications from a library of 30+, plus Power User licenses
2	Pricing model	One flat rate, unlimited users, frameworks, and vendors	The Applications you select, plus Power User licenses for the people who build and manage them
3	Setup model	Compliance data model and framework content built in	No-code graph database you build your workflows on
4	Frameworks	Content for over 30 standards and regulations	“Over 25 supported frameworks and regulations”
5	HITRUST	Native MyCSF integration, e1, i1, and r2	Not named among the frameworks on LogicGate’s own frameworks page
6	Implementation	Most teams are live in weeks	Packages from roughly 30 days (Lite) to roughly 150 days (Elite)
7	Integrations	117+, including AWS, Jira, ServiceNow, Splunk, and Tenable	No aggregate count published
8	AI	GRACI builds an isolated model per use and trains only on your instance data	Spark AI sends the relevant fields to OpenAI’s API, which doesn’t train on them and deletes them after 30 days
9	Support	Named CSM and phone support, included for every customer	Technical Account Manager available through Professional Services

ZenGRC vs LogicGate on the parts that decide it

Start with it already built

Every GRC platform asks you to decide how controls, risks, evidence, and audits connect, the question is whether that structure comes built or gets built by you. In ZenGRC that structure is already mapped, and you edit it from day one.

#	Area	ZenGRC	LogicGate
1	Setup model	Compliance data model and framework content built in.	No-code graph database you build your workflows on.
2	What’s preconfigured	The full data model, with no schema to design.	The graph structure; workflows are built by your team.
3	Framework content	Loaded on day one for 30+ standards and regulations.	Cross-mapped to over 30 trusted frameworks as you configure them.

Bottom line: ZenGRC’s structure comes preconfigured, so you’re editing it from day one instead of designing it. LogicGate’s graph database gives you more room to build something custom, but that room has to be filled in before the platform does much for you.

One price, every seat and module

Both platforms price around usage, but what gets metered is where the difference lies.

#	Area	ZenGRC	LogicGate
1	What you buy	The whole platform: compliance, audit, risk, policy, vendor management.	Individual Applications from a library of 30+.
2	Who costs extra	Nobody — unlimited users included.	Power User licenses for anyone who builds or manages an Application.
3	Adding a module or seat	No added line item.	A new Application or Power User adds to the bill.

Bottom line: LogicGate measures two things: the Applications you pick and the people who manage them. ZenGRC’s flat rate covers every module and every seat, so taking on more of your program doesn’t turn into a new negotiation.

Map controls once

Cross-framework mapping is what turns one evidence pull into coverage for several audits, the difference is how the mapping gets built.

#	Area	ZenGRC	LogicGate
1	Mapping approach	Cross-framework control mapping built into the data model.	Common control set you configure inside your own workflows.
2	Framework coverage	Content for 30+ standards and regulations.	Over 25 supported frameworks and regulations.
3	Gap visibility	Flags gaps and overlaps between two live programs automatically.	Depends on how the workflow is configured.

Bottom line: ZenGRC’s mapping is native to the platform, so HITRUST, SOC 2, and HIPAA sit under one control set without you building the relationships yourself. With LogicGate, the mapping logic is something your team configures rather than something that’s already there.

Stop chasing screenshots

Manual evidence collection is where most audit prep time actually goes, so the integration list matters more than it looks like it should. ZenGRC connects to 117+ systems and pulls the evidence straight out of them.

#	Area	ZenGRC	LogicGate
1	Integration count	117+, including AWS, Jira, ServiceNow, Splunk, and Tenable.	No aggregate count published; Jira integration confirmed.
2	Evidence automation	Evidence pulled automatically from connected systems.	Automated evidence collection tasks configured within workflows.
3	Evidence tagging	Every artifact tagged to the control it supports.	Depends on how the workflow is configured.

Bottom line: ZenGRC pulls evidence straight out of 117+ connected systems and tags it to the control it supports. LogicGate doesn’t publish a comparable integration count.

HITRUST runs natively

Your assessment lives in MyCSF and your program lives somewhere else. So you key everything in twice. ZenGRC connects directly to MyCSF through a native API integration.

#	Area	ZenGRC	LogicGate
1	MyCSF integration	Native API integration, evidence and control responses sync both ways.	No native integration, mapping support requires your own separate MyCSF subscription.
2	Certification levels	e1, i1, and r2 supported natively.	Not published.
3	Where HITRUST shows up	Named directly on ZenGRC’s HITRUST product page.	Covered in LogicGate’s help center and blog, not on its main frameworks page.

Bottom line: ZenGRC connects directly to MyCSF, so evidence and control responses sync both ways without a second system. LogicGate does support HITRUST CSF mappings, but only if you’re already paying for your own MyCSF subscription.

AI that stays in your instance

Both platforms route compliance work through AI. But with GRACI, your compliance data stays inside your own instance the whole time.

#	Area	ZenGRC	LogicGate
1	AI architecture	New isolated model generated per use, run through AWS Bedrock.	Spark AI, routed through OpenAI’s API.
2	Data handling	Trained only on your instance data; model destroyed immediately after use.	OpenAI doesn’t train on the data; LogicGate says it’s deleted after 30 days.
3	Where data lives during use	Never leaves your ZenGRC instance.	Relevant fields sent to a third-party API for up to 30 days.

Bottom line: GRACI’s model is generated per use, trained only on your data, and destroyed immediately. Your data never leaves your instance. Spark AI sends the relevant fields to OpenAI, which doesn’t train on them but holds them for up to 30 days before deleting them.

A named contact, live in weeks

Reaching someone who knows your setup shouldn’t be a separate purchase. Every ZenGRC customer gets a named CSM and phone support.

#	Area	ZenGRC	LogicGate
1	Assigned contact	Named CSM and phone support included for every customer.	Technical Account Manager available through Professional Services.
2	Implementation	Expert-guided, most teams live in weeks.	Packages from roughly 30 days (Lite) to roughly 150 days (Elite).
3	What’s included	CSM, phone support, and implementation bundled into the base subscription.	Support and implementation scoped and purchased through Professional Services.

Bottom line: ZenGRC bundles a named CSM, phone support, and guided implementation into the base subscription, so the number on the contract is the number that gets you live. LogicGate’s support and implementation are scoped and purchased separately through Professional Services.

How ZenGRC stands apart

ZenGRC is built for teams that want the platform ready on day one, a data model that’s already mapped, one rate for every seat and module, and support that doesn’t get sold back to you as a separate line item.

Nothing to build before you start

The compliance data model and framework content come preconfigured, so there’s no schema to design and no dedicated builder role to keep the structure together. You’re testing controls and prepping for audits in week one.

One control test can close out three frameworks

Map a control once and it applies everywhere the frameworks overlap. Bring HITRUST, SOC 2, and HIPAA under one control set without rebuilding it, meaning one piece of evidence counts toward every framework that asks for it.

One flat rate, every seat and every module

Compliance, audit, risk, policy, and vendor management are all included for an unlimited number of users. Nobody pays a Power User fee to manage the program, and taking on more of it doesn’t add a line item.

Live in weeks, not months

Framework content is ready to use the first time you log in, and expert-guided implementation is included in the base subscription. There’s no services quote to wait on before your team can start.

Your compliance data never leaves your instance

GRACI generates a new isolated model for each use, trained only on your instance data, and destroys it right after. Your evidence never trains an external model and never routes through a third-party API.

Proven on complex, multi-framework programs

Bluegreen Vacations runs SOC and SOX compliance across 100-plus enterprise applications in ZenGRC. In their own words, their audit and compliance effort has “easily been cut in half,” and their Director of IT Risk and Compliance called ZenGRC “simple, yet powerful” after just the first demo.

Make the move from LogicGate to ZenGRC stress-free

You put serious configuration work into your LogicGate Risk Cloud applications. We’ll pull that content into ZenGRC during implementation.

Your Risk Cloud control records, evidence, and framework mappings come across intact, while your named CSM runs the migration alongside your team. The compliance structure is already built on our side, so there’s nothing to rebuild.

Book a demo

Common questions about ZenGRC vs LogicGate

Is ZenGRC a full replacement for LogicGate?

Yes, for compliance, audit readiness, policy, and vendor risk. ZenGRC covers all of that in one platform. LogicGate’s graph database gives you more room to build a custom risk model from scratch.

What does ZenGRC cost compared to LogicGate?

Neither of us publishes a price list. Ours is one flat number, however many users, frameworks, or vendors you add. LogicGate prices the Applications you pick, plus Power User licenses.

Book a demo and we’ll price your actual program.

Do I need a dedicated admin to run ZenGRC?

No. The data model, the framework content, and the links between controls and evidence are already built. Your team’s hours go into testing and audit prep.

How long does implementation take?

Most teams are live in weeks, and expert-guided implementation is included. LogicGate publishes implementation packages running from roughly 30 days to roughly 150. We’ll walk you through a plan for your specific frameworks on the demo.

Does ZenGRC support HITRUST?

It does, natively, across e1, i1, and r2. ZenGRC connects to MyCSF through a native API integration. Evidence and control responses sync both ways.

Can I bring my existing controls and evidence with me?

You can. We import them during implementation and map them to every framework you’re carrying. A named CSM runs that part with your team.